UTF-8 decoder capability and stress test
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Markus Kuhn <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/> - 2003-02-19
|
|
|
|
This test file can help you examine, how your UTF-8 decoder handles
|
|
various types of correct, malformed, or otherwise interesting UTF-8
|
|
sequences. This file is not meant to be a conformance test. It does
|
|
not prescribes any particular outcome and therefore there is no way to
|
|
"pass" or "fail" this test file, even though the texts suggests a
|
|
preferable decoder behaviour at some places. The aim is instead to
|
|
help you think about and test the behaviour of your UTF-8 on a
|
|
systematic collection of unusual inputs. Experience so far suggests
|
|
that most first-time authors of UTF-8 decoders find at least one
|
|
serious problem in their decoder by using this file.
|
|
|
|
The test lines below cover boundary conditions, malformed UTF-8
|
|
sequences as well as correctly encoded UTF-8 sequences of Unicode code
|
|
points that should never occur in a correct UTF-8 file.
|
|
|
|
According to ISO 10646-1:2000, sections D.7 and 2.3c, a device
|
|
receiving UTF-8 shall interpret a "malformed sequence in the same way
|
|
that it interprets a character that is outside the adopted subset" and
|
|
"characters that are not within the adopted subset shall be indicated
|
|
to the user" by a receiving device. A quite commonly used approach in
|
|
UTF-8 decoders is to replace any malformed UTF-8 sequence by a
|
|
replacement character (U+FFFD), which looks a bit like an inverted
|
|
question mark, or a similar symbol. It might be a good idea to
|
|
visually distinguish a malformed UTF-8 sequence from a correctly
|
|
encoded Unicode character that is just not available in the current
|
|
font but otherwise fully legal, even though ISO 10646-1 doesn't
|
|
mandate this. In any case, just ignoring malformed sequences or
|
|
unavailable characters does not conform to ISO 10646, will make
|
|
debugging more difficult, and can lead to user confusion.
|
|
|
|
Please check, whether a malformed UTF-8 sequence is (1) represented at
|
|
all, (2) represented by exactly one single replacement character (or
|
|
equivalent signal), and (3) the following quotation mark after an
|
|
illegal UTF-8 sequence is correctly displayed, i.e. proper
|
|
resynchronization takes place immageately after any malformed
|
|
sequence. This file says "THE END" in the last line, so if you don't
|
|
see that, your decoder crashed somehow before, which should always be
|
|
cause for concern.
|
|
|
|
All lines in this file are exactly 79 characters long (plus the line
|
|
feed). In addition, all lines end with "|", except for the two test
|
|
lines 2.1.1 and 2.2.1, which contain non-printable ASCII controls
|
|
U+0000 and U+007F. If you display this file with a fixed-width font,
|
|
these "|" characters should all line up in column 79 (right margin).
|
|
This allows you to test quickly, whether your UTF-8 decoder finds the
|
|
correct number of characters in every line, that is whether each
|
|
malformed sequences is replaced by a single replacement character.
|
|
|
|
Note that as an alternative to the notion of malformed sequence used
|
|
here, it is also a perfectly acceptable (and in some situations even
|
|
preferable) solution to represent each individual byte of a malformed
|
|
sequence by a replacement character. If you follow this strategy in
|
|
your decoder, then please ignore the "|" column.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here come the tests: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Some correct UTF-8 text |
|
|
|
|
|
(The codepoints for this test are: |
|
|
U+03BA U+1F79 U+03C3 U+03BC U+03B5 --ryan.) |
|
|
|
|
|
You should see the Greek word 'kosme': "κόσμε" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Boundary condition test cases |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 First possible sequence of a certain length |
|
|
|
|
|
(byte zero skipped...there's a null added at the end of the test. --ryan.) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.2 2 bytes (U-00000080): "€" |
|
|
2.1.3 3 bytes (U-00000800): "à €" |
|
|
2.1.4 4 bytes (U-00010000): "�" |
|
|
|
|
|
(5 and 6 byte sequences were made illegal in rfc3629. --ryan.) |
|
|
2.1.5 5 bytes (U-00200000): "øˆ€€€" |
|
|
2.1.6 6 bytes (U-04000000): "ü„€€€€" |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 Last possible sequence of a certain length |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2.1 1 byte (U-0000007F): "" |
|
|
2.2.2 2 bytes (U-000007FF): "ß¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
(Section 5.3.2 below calls this illegal. --ryan.) |
|
|
2.2.3 3 bytes (U-0000FFFF): "ï¿¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
(5 and 6 bytes sequences, and 4 bytes sequences > 0x10FFFF were made illegal |
|
|
in rfc3629, so these next three should be replaced with a invalid |
|
|
character codepoint. --ryan.) |
|
|
2.2.4 4 bytes (U-001FFFFF): "÷¿¿¿" |
|
|
2.2.5 5 bytes (U-03FFFFFF): "û¿¿¿¿" |
|
|
2.2.6 6 bytes (U-7FFFFFFF): "ý¿¿¿¿¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 Other boundary conditions |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3.1 U-0000D7FF = ed 9f bf = "퟿" |
|
|
2.3.2 U-0000E000 = ee 80 80 = "" |
|
|
2.3.3 U-0000FFFD = ef bf bd = "�" |
|
|
2.3.4 U-0010FFFF = f4 8f bf bf = "�" |
|
|
|
|
|
(This one is bogus in rfc3629. --ryan.) |
|
|
2.3.5 U-00110000 = f4 90 80 80 = "�" |
|
|
|
|
|
3 Malformed sequences |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Unexpected continuation bytes |
|
|
|
|
|
Each unexpected continuation byte should be separately signalled as a |
|
|
malformed sequence of its own. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.1 First continuation byte 0x80: "€" |
|
|
3.1.2 Last continuation byte 0xbf: "¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.3 2 continuation bytes: "€¿" |
|
|
3.1.4 3 continuation bytes: "€¿€" |
|
|
3.1.5 4 continuation bytes: "€¿€¿" |
|
|
3.1.6 5 continuation bytes: "€¿€¿€" |
|
|
3.1.7 6 continuation bytes: "€¿€¿€¿" |
|
|
3.1.8 7 continuation bytes: "€¿€¿€¿€" |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.9 Sequence of all 64 possible continuation bytes (0x80-0xbf): |
|
|
|
|
|
"€�‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š‹Œ�Ž� |
|
|
�‘’“”•–—˜™š›œ�žŸ |
|
|
¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬®¯ |
|
|
°±²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼½¾¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 Lonely start characters |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.1 All 32 first bytes of 2-byte sequences (0xc0-0xdf), |
|
|
each followed by a space character: |
|
|
|
|
|
"À Á Â Ã Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï |
|
|
Ð Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö × Ø Ù Ú Û Ü Ý Þ ß " |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.2 All 16 first bytes of 3-byte sequences (0xe0-0xef), |
|
|
each followed by a space character: |
|
|
|
|
|
"à á â ã ä å æ ç è é ê ë ì í î ï " |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.3 All 8 first bytes of 4-byte sequences (0xf0-0xf7), |
|
|
each followed by a space character: |
|
|
|
|
|
"ð ñ ò ó ô õ ö ÷ " |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.4 All 4 first bytes of 5-byte sequences (0xf8-0xfb), |
|
|
each followed by a space character: |
|
|
|
|
|
"ø ù ú û " |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.5 All 2 first bytes of 6-byte sequences (0xfc-0xfd), |
|
|
each followed by a space character: |
|
|
|
|
|
"ü ý " |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 Sequences with last continuation byte missing |
|
|
|
|
|
All bytes of an incomplete sequence should be signalled as a single |
|
|
malformed sequence, i.e., you should see only a single replacement |
|
|
character in each of the next 10 tests. (Characters as in section 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.1 2-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "À" |
|
|
3.3.2 3-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "à€" |
|
|
3.3.3 4-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "ð€€" |
|
|
3.3.4 5-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "ø€€€" |
|
|
3.3.5 6-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "ü€€€€" |
|
|
3.3.6 2-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-000007FF): "ß" |
|
|
3.3.7 3-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-0000FFFF): "ï¿" |
|
|
3.3.8 4-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-001FFFFF): "÷¿¿" |
|
|
3.3.9 5-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-03FFFFFF): "û¿¿¿" |
|
|
3.3.10 6-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-7FFFFFFF): "ý¿¿¿¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 Concatenation of incomplete sequences |
|
|
|
|
|
All the 10 sequences of 3.3 concatenated, you should see 10 malformed |
|
|
sequences being signalled: |
|
|
|
|
|
"Àà€ð€€ø€€€ü€€€€ßï¿÷¿¿û¿¿¿ý¿¿¿¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 Impossible bytes |
|
|
|
|
|
The following two bytes cannot appear in a correct UTF-8 string |
|
|
|
|
|
3.5.1 fe = "þ" |
|
|
3.5.2 ff = "ÿ" |
|
|
3.5.3 fe fe ff ff = "þþÿÿ" |
|
|
|
|
|
4 Overlong sequences |
|
|
|
|
|
The following sequences are not malformed according to the letter of |
|
|
the Unicode 2.0 standard. However, they are longer then necessary and |
|
|
a correct UTF-8 encoder is not allowed to produce them. A "safe UTF-8 |
|
|
decoder" should reject them just like malformed sequences for two |
|
|
reasons: (1) It helps to debug applications if overlong sequences are |
|
|
not treated as valid representations of characters, because this helps |
|
|
to spot problems more quickly. (2) Overlong sequences provide |
|
|
alternative representations of characters, that could maliciously be |
|
|
used to bypass filters that check only for ASCII characters. For |
|
|
instance, a 2-byte encoded line feed (LF) would not be caught by a |
|
|
line counter that counts only 0x0a bytes, but it would still be |
|
|
processed as a line feed by an unsafe UTF-8 decoder later in the |
|
|
pipeline. From a security point of view, ASCII compatibility of UTF-8 |
|
|
sequences means also, that ASCII characters are *only* allowed to be |
|
|
represented by ASCII bytes in the range 0x00-0x7f. To ensure this |
|
|
aspect of ASCII compatibility, use only "safe UTF-8 decoders" that |
|
|
reject overlong UTF-8 sequences for which a shorter encoding exists. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 Examples of an overlong ASCII character |
|
|
|
|
|
With a safe UTF-8 decoder, all of the following five overlong |
|
|
representations of the ASCII character slash ("/") should be rejected |
|
|
like a malformed UTF-8 sequence, for instance by substituting it with |
|
|
a replacement character. If you see a slash below, you do not have a |
|
|
safe UTF-8 decoder! |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1.1 U+002F = c0 af = "À¯" |
|
|
4.1.2 U+002F = e0 80 af = "à€¯" |
|
|
4.1.3 U+002F = f0 80 80 af = "ð€€¯" |
|
|
4.1.4 U+002F = f8 80 80 80 af = "ø€€€¯" |
|
|
4.1.5 U+002F = fc 80 80 80 80 af = "ü€€€€¯" |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 Maximum overlong sequences |
|
|
|
|
|
Below you see the highest Unicode value that is still resulting in an |
|
|
overlong sequence if represented with the given number of bytes. This |
|
|
is a boundary test for safe UTF-8 decoders. All five characters should |
|
|
be rejected like malformed UTF-8 sequences. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.1 U-0000007F = c1 bf = "Á¿" |
|
|
4.2.2 U-000007FF = e0 9f bf = "àŸ¿" |
|
|
4.2.3 U-0000FFFF = f0 8f bf bf = "�" |
|
|
4.2.4 U-001FFFFF = f8 87 bf bf bf = "ø‡¿¿¿" |
|
|
4.2.5 U-03FFFFFF = fc 83 bf bf bf bf = "üƒ¿¿¿¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 Overlong representation of the NUL character |
|
|
|
|
|
The following five sequences should also be rejected like malformed |
|
|
UTF-8 sequences and should not be treated like the ASCII NUL |
|
|
character. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.1 U+0000 = c0 80 = "À€" |
|
|
4.3.2 U+0000 = e0 80 80 = "à€€" |
|
|
4.3.3 U+0000 = f0 80 80 80 = "ð€€€" |
|
|
4.3.4 U+0000 = f8 80 80 80 80 = "ø€€€€" |
|
|
4.3.5 U+0000 = fc 80 80 80 80 80 = "ü€€€€€" |
|
|
|
|
|
5 Illegal code positions |
|
|
|
|
|
The following UTF-8 sequences should be rejected like malformed |
|
|
sequences, because they never represent valid ISO 10646 characters and |
|
|
a UTF-8 decoder that accepts them might introduce security problems |
|
|
comparable to overlong UTF-8 sequences. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 Single UTF-16 surrogates |
|
|
|
|
|
5.1.1 U+D800 = ed a0 80 = "í €" |
|
|
5.1.2 U+DB7F = ed ad bf = "í¿" |
|
|
5.1.3 U+DB80 = ed ae 80 = "í®€" |
|
|
5.1.4 U+DBFF = ed af bf = "í¯¿" |
|
|
5.1.5 U+DC00 = ed b0 80 = "í°€" |
|
|
5.1.6 U+DF80 = ed be 80 = "í¾€" |
|
|
5.1.7 U+DFFF = ed bf bf = "í¿¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 Paired UTF-16 surrogates |
|
|
|
|
|
5.2.1 U+D800 U+DC00 = ed a0 80 ed b0 80 = "í €í°€" |
|
|
5.2.2 U+D800 U+DFFF = ed a0 80 ed bf bf = "í €í¿¿" |
|
|
5.2.3 U+DB7F U+DC00 = ed ad bf ed b0 80 = "í¿í°€" |
|
|
5.2.4 U+DB7F U+DFFF = ed ad bf ed bf bf = "í¿í¿¿" |
|
|
5.2.5 U+DB80 U+DC00 = ed ae 80 ed b0 80 = "󰀀" |
|
|
5.2.6 U+DB80 U+DFFF = ed ae 80 ed bf bf = "󰏿" |
|
|
5.2.7 U+DBFF U+DC00 = ed af bf ed b0 80 = "􏰀" |
|
|
5.2.8 U+DBFF U+DFFF = ed af bf ed bf bf = "􏿿" |
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 Other illegal code positions |
|
|
|
|
|
5.3.1 U+FFFE = ef bf be = "￾" |
|
|
5.3.2 U+FFFF = ef bf bf = "ï¿¿" |
|
|
|
|
|
THE END |
|
|
|